Signs of divisiveness, discrimination and stigmatization caused by Jeffrey Beall's “predatory” open access publishing blacklists and philosophy

نویسندگان

چکیده

Jeffrey Beall, a US librarian, coined the term “predatory publishing” specifically to describe movement or phenomenon of open access (OA) journals and publishers that he others believed displayed exploitative unscholarly principles. Using blog transmit those ideas, profiling specific cases using blacklists, one most polemic aspects Beall's was its tendency attract incite academic radicalism. Beall targeted both standalone journals, but how precisely determined an OA journal publisher predatory in many ambiguity. deficient highly subjective criteria, as well blacklists' incapacity clearly distinguish low quality from ones, may have negatively impacted operations several Beall-blacklisted publishers. Freedom speech embraces prejudice, via blog, establishment “predatory” are enhanced discriminatory ideologies continue be carried downstream by other like-minded individuals groups who proliferate divisiveness also formalizing institutionalizing culture discriminative philosophies cloning blacklists encouraging their continued use.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Open access, predatory publishing and peer-review

* In recent years, scholarly publishing faced a new paradigm regarding the accessibility: the open access movement. " If an article is "Open Access" it means that it can be freely accessed by anyone in the world using an internet connection ". 1 The Budapest Open Access Initiative states: " By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any...

متن کامل

Medical Publishing Triage – Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers

This editorial examines the problem of predatory publishers and how they have negatively affected scholarly communication. Society relies on high-quality, peer-reviewed articles for public policy, legal cases, and improving the public health. Researchers need to be aware of how predatory publishers operate and need to avoid falling into their traps. The editorial examines the recent history of ...

متن کامل

predatory open access journals

سخن سردبیر editorial مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان دوره پانزدهم، آبان 1395، 808-807 مجلات یغماگر با دسترسی آزاد predatory open access journals محسن رضائیان[1]،[2] m. rezaeian پیدایش و رشد «مجلات با دسترسی آزاد» (open access journals) در سالیان اخیر، نویدبخش دوره جدیدی از چاپ و انتشار یافته های نوین علمی بود. قرار بود که در این دوره جدید، نویسندگان یک مقاله علمی با پرداخت هزینه های چاپ، نتیجه ...

متن کامل

Authors and open access publishing

Surveys were carried out to learn more about authors and open access publishing. Awareness of open access journals among those who had not published in them was quite high; awareness of ‘self-archiving’ was less. For open access journal authors the most important reason for publishing in that way was the principle of free access; their main concerns were grants and impact. Authors who had not p...

متن کامل

A lesson learned about predatory journals and their difference from peer-reviewed open-access publishing

Ever since theWomen’s Dermatologic Society (WDS) Board of Directors voted in March of 2014 to establish a peer-reviewed journal, our leadership has realized how the advent of predatory publishing has affected the establishment of a legitimate medical publication. For example, in 2014, there were already approximately 40 different dermatologic journals but nonewith a specific focus onwomen’s ski...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: The Journal of Academic Librarianship

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['0099-1333', '1879-1999']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102418